Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-19-2018
Description
Why did Americans vote for Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential election? Social scientists have proposed a variety of explanations, including economic dissatisfaction, sexism, racism, Islamophobia, and xenophobia. The current study establishes that, independent of these influences, voting for Trump was, at least for many Americans, a symbolic defense of the United States’ perceived Christian heritage. Data from a national probability sample of Americans surveyed soon after the 2016 election shows that greater adherence to Christian nationalist ideology was a robust predictor of voting for Trump, even after controlling for economic dissatisfaction, sexism, anti-black prejudice, anti-Muslim refugee attitudes, and anti-immigrant sentiment, as well as measures of religion, sociodemographics, and political identity more generally. These findings indicate that Christian nationalist ideology—although correlated with a variety of class-based, sexist, racist, and ethnocentric views—is not synonymous with, reducible to, or strictly epiphenomenal of such views. Rather, Christian nationalism operates as a unique and independent ideology that can influence political actions by calling forth a defense of mythological narratives about America’s distinctively Christian heritage and future.
Citation Information
Whitehead, Andrew L.; Perry, Samuel L.; and Baker, Joseph O.. 2018. Make America Christian Again: Christian Nationalism and Voting for Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election. Sociology of Religion. Vol.79(2). 147-171. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srx070 ISSN: 1759-8818
Copyright Statement
This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Sociology of Religion following peer review. The version of record Andrew L Whitehead, Samuel L Perry, Joseph O Baker; Make America Christian Again: Christian Nationalism and Voting for Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election, Sociology of Religion, Volume 79, Issue 2, 19 May 2018, Pages 147–171, https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srx070 is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srx070
This document is under a CC0 1.0 Universal license.