The Two Sources of Moral Standing
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-1-2012
Description
There are two primary traditions in philosophical theorizing about moral standing-one emphasizing Experience (the capacity to feel pain and pleasure) and one emphasizing Agency (complexity of cognition and lifestyle). In this article we offer an explanation for this divide: Lay judgments about moral standing depend importantly on two independent cues (Experience and Agency), and the two philosophical traditions reflect this aspect of folk moral cognition. In support of this two-source hypothesis, we present the results of a series of new experiments providing evidence for our account of lay judgments about moral standing, and argue that these results lend plausibility to the proposed causal link between folk moral cognition and the philosophical traditions.
Citation Information
Sytsma, Justin; and Machery, Edouard. 2012. The Two Sources of Moral Standing. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. Vol.3(3). 303-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-012-0102-7 ISSN: 1878-5158