Presenter Classification

Graduate Student

Presentation Type

Poster Presentation

Publication Date

4-11-2024

Start Date

11-4-2024 2:10 PM

End Date

11-4-2024 2:45 PM

Keywords

change in hospital routines, sleep in post-surgery patients, improved hospital sleep, recovery after cardiac surgery

Abstract Type

Quality Improvement/Process Improvement Project

Abstract

Purpose: Restoring Effective Sleep Time in Post Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Quality Improvement Project

Brooke Watts, BSN, RN, DNP Student, Murray State University

Dr. Kristin Reid, DNP, APRN, ACNS-BC, DNP Program Director/Assistant Professor Murray State University

Aims: This quality improvement project was developed using DNP project guidelines provided through Murray State University and was designed to improve sleep in hospitalized cardiac surgery patients.

Processes: IRB approval was obtained from the healthcare institution and academic institution. This two-phase quality improvement project was designed to analyze the effects of a change in normalized hospital routines on self-reported sleep in post-cardiac surgery patients. Phase one involved no change in unit nursing routines to draw baseline data. Phase two involved the quality improvement intervention where routine patient assessments and vital signs were executed at 11:00 p.m., and at 04:00 a.m. Any non-timed lab work or routine radiological studies were postponed until after 04:00am. Patient participation for both phase one (n=4) and phase two (n=3) were determined by exclusion criteria. The Richards Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) was utilized for data collection and patients were asked to complete the questionnaire daily.

Results: Comparison of mean patient-reported sleep scores between the pre-intervention and intervention groups showed a positive association between the quality improvement intervention and patient reported sleep.

Limitations: Limitations for this project included a small sample size in both phases. IRB stipulations required a low-risk profile which limited eligible participants. There was a limited timeframe for project execution due to time required for IRB approval and to meet course-related timelines. The project was further limited by lack of on-site dedicated project staff overseeing qualifying patient enrollment.

Conclusions: Key findings were in alignment with sleep-related findings in comparable studies and projects where unit routines were adjusted. Execution of similar projects should occur to provide more substantial evidence supporting this quality change. With evidence of this project in mind, providers and nurses can practice mindfully and incorporate creative approaches to safely care for patients and improve sleep.

Watts_Brooke 1 (1).JPG (6790 kB)
Headshot

Share

COinS
 
Apr 11th, 2:10 PM Apr 11th, 2:45 PM

Restoring Effective Sleep Time in Post Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Quality Improvement Project

Purpose: Restoring Effective Sleep Time in Post Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Quality Improvement Project

Brooke Watts, BSN, RN, DNP Student, Murray State University

Dr. Kristin Reid, DNP, APRN, ACNS-BC, DNP Program Director/Assistant Professor Murray State University

Aims: This quality improvement project was developed using DNP project guidelines provided through Murray State University and was designed to improve sleep in hospitalized cardiac surgery patients.

Processes: IRB approval was obtained from the healthcare institution and academic institution. This two-phase quality improvement project was designed to analyze the effects of a change in normalized hospital routines on self-reported sleep in post-cardiac surgery patients. Phase one involved no change in unit nursing routines to draw baseline data. Phase two involved the quality improvement intervention where routine patient assessments and vital signs were executed at 11:00 p.m., and at 04:00 a.m. Any non-timed lab work or routine radiological studies were postponed until after 04:00am. Patient participation for both phase one (n=4) and phase two (n=3) were determined by exclusion criteria. The Richards Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) was utilized for data collection and patients were asked to complete the questionnaire daily.

Results: Comparison of mean patient-reported sleep scores between the pre-intervention and intervention groups showed a positive association between the quality improvement intervention and patient reported sleep.

Limitations: Limitations for this project included a small sample size in both phases. IRB stipulations required a low-risk profile which limited eligible participants. There was a limited timeframe for project execution due to time required for IRB approval and to meet course-related timelines. The project was further limited by lack of on-site dedicated project staff overseeing qualifying patient enrollment.

Conclusions: Key findings were in alignment with sleep-related findings in comparable studies and projects where unit routines were adjusted. Execution of similar projects should occur to provide more substantial evidence supporting this quality change. With evidence of this project in mind, providers and nurses can practice mindfully and incorporate creative approaches to safely care for patients and improve sleep.