There are many issues that relate to the efficacy of the undergraduate degree in the field of communicative disorders. Some have advocated for the elimination of the degree while others vigorously fight to maintain it. Some believe that there should be clinic associated with the undergraduate degree while others argue to have the degree but without clinic. Some state departments of education allow persons with an undergraduate degree in communicative disorders to practice in the schools, others do not. Colleges and universities are afraid that without an undergraduate degree program, their departments will be seen as vulnerable to elimination in the academy. Other colleges and universities want to close their undergraduate programs to concentrate on their master's and doctoral degrees, especially because of the shortage of doctoral level faculty to adequately staff all their programs. All of these issues and many more play into the debate about the continuation of the undergraduate degree in the field of communicative disorders. Today you are going to hear from three members of the Council who have very different viewpoints on the issue. We hope to stimulate discussion that will be productive in helping you and your departments determine the efficacy of your undergraduate degree in the field
Steckol, Karen F.; Fagelson, Marc A.; and Tullos, Dan C.. 2006. Linking the Undergraduate Degree to the Graduate Degree: Core Curriculum Issues. Council of Academic Programs in Communication Sciences and Disorders Annual Conference, Destin, FL. http://www.capcsd.org/proceedings/2006/talks/Linking%20UG%20to%20Grad%20Steckol.pdf
© The Authors. This document was originally published by the Council of Academic Programs in Communication Sciences and Disorders Annual Conference.