Comparing the use of American Sign Language and Speech Generating Devices for Children with Developmental Disabilities

Faculty Mentor

Dr. Pamela Mims

Mentor Home Department

Educational Foundations and Special Education

Short Abstract

This study compared the acquisition and maintenance of an Augmentative and Alternative device (iPad on application LAMP), and American Sign Language when teaching a 6th-grade student with a developmental disability (IDD) and limited functional vocal verbal speech to make a request. A single-case alternating treatment design was applied to compare the acquisition rate between the two strategies . The system of least prompts was used to teach the participant how to perform the request using the AAC device and ASL. Results showed that the student required fewer sessions to reach mastery with making a request using the AAC device. This study showed the system of least prompts paired with AAC was an effective an efficient strategy for acquisition of a targeted communication request. This study provides evidence strategies that could be used when identifying a priority communication system for learners with limited functional speech and IDD.

Category

Social Sciences

Start Date

24-4-2023 2:45 PM

End Date

24-4-2023 3:00 PM

Location

D.P. Culp Center Room 210

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 24th, 2:45 PM Apr 24th, 3:00 PM

Comparing the use of American Sign Language and Speech Generating Devices for Children with Developmental Disabilities

D.P. Culp Center Room 210

This study compared the acquisition and maintenance of an Augmentative and Alternative device (iPad on application LAMP), and American Sign Language when teaching a 6th-grade student with a developmental disability (IDD) and limited functional vocal verbal speech to make a request. A single-case alternating treatment design was applied to compare the acquisition rate between the two strategies . The system of least prompts was used to teach the participant how to perform the request using the AAC device and ASL. Results showed that the student required fewer sessions to reach mastery with making a request using the AAC device. This study showed the system of least prompts paired with AAC was an effective an efficient strategy for acquisition of a targeted communication request. This study provides evidence strategies that could be used when identifying a priority communication system for learners with limited functional speech and IDD.