Location
Culp Forum 311
Start Date
4-6-2022 10:00 AM
End Date
4-6-2022 11:00 AM
Faculty Sponsor’s Department
Health Services Management & Policy
Name of Project's Faculty Sponsor
Kate Beatty
Competition Type
Competitive
Type
Oral Presentation
Project's Category
Healthcare, Public Health, Reproductive Health Services, Womens Health
Abstract or Artist's Statement
Introduction: Contraceptive decision-making is individual in nature and access to high-quality contraceptive care, including counseling and the full range of contraceptive methods, can help individuals achieve their personal reproductive goals and prevent unintended pregnancy. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted provision and utilization of contraceptive counseling and contraceptive methods. Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) methods, such as the contraceptive implant and intrauterine devices (IUDs), were particularly affected by the pandemic because they require placement by a health care provider in a clinical setting. Choose Well (CW), an ongoing statewide contraceptive access initiative in South Carolina, launched in 2017 and continues through 2022. CW aims to implement best practices of contraceptive care via training and funding for IUD and implant methods. This study examined the perceptions of access to contraceptive counseling and implant and IUD methods during the pandemic in 2020 among CW hospital partners.
Methods: Data were collected in 2021 via key informant interviews with partners (n=9) at CW implementing hospitals to assess perceptions of CW activities in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. A semi-structured interview guide was used, and interviews were recorded, transcribed, and consensus coded. A codebook was developed based on the interview guide. Data from select questions of interest related to perceived access to contraceptive counseling, access to LARC methods, and the impact of the pandemic on contraceptive care services were analyzed for this study. Coding was conducted with NVivo software version 1.6.1.
Results: Findings show that there was continued provision of contraceptive services during COVID-19 at CW partner hospitals, including an increase in access to contraceptive counseling and LARCs in 2020. The most prevalent facilitator for increased access to contraceptive counseling and LARCs at CW partner hospitals was having key personnel available such as physicians and Obstetrics (OB) navigators. Expanded access to outpatient sites was also noted as a facilitator of contraceptive counseling. Advertising and wide-spread patient education, buy-in and engagement from staff were additional facilitators for the increased access to LARCs. Considering the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, patients wanting to quickly leave the hospital and challenges with staffing contributed to an overall decline in access in some hospital locations. Challenges with staffing included not being able to receive training and nurses being overworked and overburdened.
Conclusion: While COVID-19 has posed challenges to contraceptive care service provision, most individuals perceived an increase in access to contraceptive counseling and LARCs at CW partner hospitals. Hospital partners have continued to provide contraceptive services during COVID-19. The findings suggest the success of the CW initiative in increasing access to contraceptive services, particularly during COVID-19 through key facilitators. Staffing positions such as OB Navigators should be funded and maintained to increase access to contraceptive care services in hospital inpatient settings. Coordinating care between hospital inpatient and outpatient settings is similarly important for widespread patient education about contraceptive care services.
Access to Contraceptive Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perceptions of Choose Well Hospital Partners
Culp Forum 311
Introduction: Contraceptive decision-making is individual in nature and access to high-quality contraceptive care, including counseling and the full range of contraceptive methods, can help individuals achieve their personal reproductive goals and prevent unintended pregnancy. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted provision and utilization of contraceptive counseling and contraceptive methods. Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) methods, such as the contraceptive implant and intrauterine devices (IUDs), were particularly affected by the pandemic because they require placement by a health care provider in a clinical setting. Choose Well (CW), an ongoing statewide contraceptive access initiative in South Carolina, launched in 2017 and continues through 2022. CW aims to implement best practices of contraceptive care via training and funding for IUD and implant methods. This study examined the perceptions of access to contraceptive counseling and implant and IUD methods during the pandemic in 2020 among CW hospital partners.
Methods: Data were collected in 2021 via key informant interviews with partners (n=9) at CW implementing hospitals to assess perceptions of CW activities in 2020, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. A semi-structured interview guide was used, and interviews were recorded, transcribed, and consensus coded. A codebook was developed based on the interview guide. Data from select questions of interest related to perceived access to contraceptive counseling, access to LARC methods, and the impact of the pandemic on contraceptive care services were analyzed for this study. Coding was conducted with NVivo software version 1.6.1.
Results: Findings show that there was continued provision of contraceptive services during COVID-19 at CW partner hospitals, including an increase in access to contraceptive counseling and LARCs in 2020. The most prevalent facilitator for increased access to contraceptive counseling and LARCs at CW partner hospitals was having key personnel available such as physicians and Obstetrics (OB) navigators. Expanded access to outpatient sites was also noted as a facilitator of contraceptive counseling. Advertising and wide-spread patient education, buy-in and engagement from staff were additional facilitators for the increased access to LARCs. Considering the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, patients wanting to quickly leave the hospital and challenges with staffing contributed to an overall decline in access in some hospital locations. Challenges with staffing included not being able to receive training and nurses being overworked and overburdened.
Conclusion: While COVID-19 has posed challenges to contraceptive care service provision, most individuals perceived an increase in access to contraceptive counseling and LARCs at CW partner hospitals. Hospital partners have continued to provide contraceptive services during COVID-19. The findings suggest the success of the CW initiative in increasing access to contraceptive services, particularly during COVID-19 through key facilitators. Staffing positions such as OB Navigators should be funded and maintained to increase access to contraceptive care services in hospital inpatient settings. Coordinating care between hospital inpatient and outpatient settings is similarly important for widespread patient education about contraceptive care services.