Faculty Sponsor’s Department
Pediatrics
Name of Project's Faculty Sponsor
Dr. Darshan Shah
Additional Sponsors
Dr. Beth Bailey, PhD, Department of Pediatrics, Quillen College of Medicine, East TN State University, Johnson City, TN BETH.BAILEY@ucdenver.edu
Type
Poster: Competitive
Project's Category
Neonatal Disorders, Child Health
Abstract or Artist's Statement
Background:
Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS), a manifestation of the widespread opioid epidemic, has plagued our country, and particularly the region of Northeast Tennessee, for quite some time now. One question among many that seems to baffle almost everyone involved in research on the topic at hand is that why do only 35-40% of opioid exposed pregnancies result in NAS requiring medication while sparing the rest. Is there some discriminatory factor other than in utero opioid exposure involved? Thus, in light of this knowledge, we wanted to investigate whether birth weight at the time of delivery can influence the development of NAS; that is, are neonates of a low birth weight or high birth weight (with respect to gestational age thresholds) more likely to develop NAS.
Methods:
Therefore, we conducted a retrospective chart analysis of all deliveries within the Mountain States Health Alliance System over a 5 years period between July 1, 2011- June 30, 2016 at all 5 delivery sites in Northeast Tennessee and Southwest Virginia (N=18,728). Out of this sample size, we identified 2,392 at-term newborns as positive for prenatal opioid exposure, and then we stratified them into 2 categories: birth weight ≤3.5kg (proxy for low or average birth weight with respect to gestational age thresholds) and birth weight ≥3.5kg (proxy for high birth weight with respect to gestational age thresholds). Thereafter, we ran SPSS statistical analyses involving chi square, t tests, and logistic regression to assess whether one birth weight group was more likely to have a higher incidence rate of NAS compared to the other birth weight group.
Results:
We found that even after controlling for significant confounders such as marital status, race, and pregnancy smoking, benzodiazepine, and marijuana use, infants who were in the low to average birth weight group (≤3.5kg in this study) were almost twice as likely (statistically significant adjusted odds ratio of 1.95) to develop NAS compared to infants who were in the high birth weight group (≥3.5kg in this study). Our study helps shed some important light on the discriminatory factors for NAS development, with birth weight being a significantly associated clinical factor as we now know.
Discussion & Implications:
Unfortunately, the mechanism for the transport of opioids across the placenta is complicated, and poorly understood. There may be more ‘unbound or free opioids’ available in infants of low to average birth weight (with respect to gestational age thresholds) compared to infants of high birth weight (with respect to gestational age thresholds) resulting in a higher incidence of NAS in the former population. It is more of a speculation rather than a conclusion to explain the results of our study. However, being equipped with this knowledge that opioid exposed neonates of low to average birth weight (with respect to gestational age thresholds) have a higher risk of developing NAS will allow physicians to identify infants with a higher risk for NAS early, and this will subsequently lead to better outcomes and reduced severity in cases of NAS.
Can Birth Weight Influence the Development of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome?
Background:
Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS), a manifestation of the widespread opioid epidemic, has plagued our country, and particularly the region of Northeast Tennessee, for quite some time now. One question among many that seems to baffle almost everyone involved in research on the topic at hand is that why do only 35-40% of opioid exposed pregnancies result in NAS requiring medication while sparing the rest. Is there some discriminatory factor other than in utero opioid exposure involved? Thus, in light of this knowledge, we wanted to investigate whether birth weight at the time of delivery can influence the development of NAS; that is, are neonates of a low birth weight or high birth weight (with respect to gestational age thresholds) more likely to develop NAS.
Methods:
Therefore, we conducted a retrospective chart analysis of all deliveries within the Mountain States Health Alliance System over a 5 years period between July 1, 2011- June 30, 2016 at all 5 delivery sites in Northeast Tennessee and Southwest Virginia (N=18,728). Out of this sample size, we identified 2,392 at-term newborns as positive for prenatal opioid exposure, and then we stratified them into 2 categories: birth weight ≤3.5kg (proxy for low or average birth weight with respect to gestational age thresholds) and birth weight ≥3.5kg (proxy for high birth weight with respect to gestational age thresholds). Thereafter, we ran SPSS statistical analyses involving chi square, t tests, and logistic regression to assess whether one birth weight group was more likely to have a higher incidence rate of NAS compared to the other birth weight group.
Results:
We found that even after controlling for significant confounders such as marital status, race, and pregnancy smoking, benzodiazepine, and marijuana use, infants who were in the low to average birth weight group (≤3.5kg in this study) were almost twice as likely (statistically significant adjusted odds ratio of 1.95) to develop NAS compared to infants who were in the high birth weight group (≥3.5kg in this study). Our study helps shed some important light on the discriminatory factors for NAS development, with birth weight being a significantly associated clinical factor as we now know.
Discussion & Implications:
Unfortunately, the mechanism for the transport of opioids across the placenta is complicated, and poorly understood. There may be more ‘unbound or free opioids’ available in infants of low to average birth weight (with respect to gestational age thresholds) compared to infants of high birth weight (with respect to gestational age thresholds) resulting in a higher incidence of NAS in the former population. It is more of a speculation rather than a conclusion to explain the results of our study. However, being equipped with this knowledge that opioid exposed neonates of low to average birth weight (with respect to gestational age thresholds) have a higher risk of developing NAS will allow physicians to identify infants with a higher risk for NAS early, and this will subsequently lead to better outcomes and reduced severity in cases of NAS.