Assessing the Inter-Rater Reliability and Accuracy of Pharmacy Faculty's Bloom's Taxonomy Classifications
Objective To identify inter-rater reliability and accuracy of pharmacy faculty members' classification of exam questions based on Bloom's Taxonomy. Methods Faculty at a college of pharmacy was given six example exam questions to assign to the appropriate Bloom's level. Results Inter-rater reliability and accuracy were both low at 0.25 and 46.0%, respectively. Accuracy increased to 81.8% when the six Bloom's levels collapsed to three. Conclusions Both inter-rater reliability and accuracy were low. Faculty members' misclassifications suggested a three-tier combination of the Bloom's levels that would optimally improve accuracy: Knowledge, Comprehension/Application, and Analysis/Synthesis/Evaluation. Faculty development should also be considered in improving accuracy and reliability.
Karpen, Samuel C.; and Welch, Adam C.. 2016. Assessing the Inter-Rater Reliability and Accuracy of Pharmacy Faculty's Bloom's Taxonomy Classifications. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. Vol.8(6). 885-888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2016.08.003 ISSN: 1877-1297