Evaluation of a New Incisional Dressing and Disposable Negative Pressure Device Compared to the Market-leading System for Dressing Survivability, User Comfort, and Skin Cleanliness: A Randomized Trial in Healthy Volunteers

Presenter Classification

Faculty

Presentation Type

Podium or Poster Presentation

Publication Date

4-24-2025

Start Date

24-4-2025 11:40 AM

End Date

24-4-2025 12:00 PM

Keywords

Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy, Skin Irritation, Patient Comfort, Patient Tolerance, Medical Adhesive Related Skin Injury

Abstract Type

Research

Abstract

Purpose and Aim

Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) reduces the risk of surgical site infections and other wound complications. However, skin irritation can occur from the application of iNPWT. A new incisional dressing aims to minimize the risk of skin irritation when used with iNPWT. This study compares the new incisional dressing with a new disposable NPWT device (experimental condition) to the market-leading iNPWT system (control condition) for dressing survivability, pain/discomfort, nuisance, skin irritation, and skin bioburden levels at seven days.

Methods

This quantitative study was approved by IRB at Lincoln Memorial University. Sixteen healthy volunteers aged meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria participated in the study. Participants acted as their own control, with researchers randomizing the experimental condition to a specific knee. Researchers prepped each knee, placed each dressing, and started the NPWT device according to manufacturer instructions. Participants rated discomfort and nuisance using a 100 mm VAS scale and assessed dressing damage daily for one week unless an unexpected event resulted in discontinuation of a device.

At dressing removal, knees were swabbed, photographed, and a blinded clinician performed a skin assessment using an FDA-defined scale. The Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was used to compare outcomes between groups.

Results

No significant difference existed in dressing survivability and skin infection risk. However, study results demonstrate improved patient comfort and tolerance for the new iNPWT system and lower skin irritation scores than the control system.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 24th, 11:40 AM Apr 24th, 12:00 PM

Evaluation of a New Incisional Dressing and Disposable Negative Pressure Device Compared to the Market-leading System for Dressing Survivability, User Comfort, and Skin Cleanliness: A Randomized Trial in Healthy Volunteers

Purpose and Aim

Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) reduces the risk of surgical site infections and other wound complications. However, skin irritation can occur from the application of iNPWT. A new incisional dressing aims to minimize the risk of skin irritation when used with iNPWT. This study compares the new incisional dressing with a new disposable NPWT device (experimental condition) to the market-leading iNPWT system (control condition) for dressing survivability, pain/discomfort, nuisance, skin irritation, and skin bioburden levels at seven days.

Methods

This quantitative study was approved by IRB at Lincoln Memorial University. Sixteen healthy volunteers aged meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria participated in the study. Participants acted as their own control, with researchers randomizing the experimental condition to a specific knee. Researchers prepped each knee, placed each dressing, and started the NPWT device according to manufacturer instructions. Participants rated discomfort and nuisance using a 100 mm VAS scale and assessed dressing damage daily for one week unless an unexpected event resulted in discontinuation of a device.

At dressing removal, knees were swabbed, photographed, and a blinded clinician performed a skin assessment using an FDA-defined scale. The Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was used to compare outcomes between groups.

Results

No significant difference existed in dressing survivability and skin infection risk. However, study results demonstrate improved patient comfort and tolerance for the new iNPWT system and lower skin irritation scores than the control system.