The Downfall of Richard III In Context
Abstract
Richard III’s downfall and lasting reputation as a ruthless usurper was a direct consequence of his lust for power and self-interest. This study examines how the contemporary accounts from Richard’s reign contrast from later historical revisionism. Primary sources from Richard’s time were shaped by shifting alliances and craft a bleak picture of Richard’s reign. A compelling piece of evidence lies within an October 1483 correspondence from the Plumpton Letters written to Robert Plumpton by his brother Edward. This letter appears to hold self-censorship, with Edward lamenting the “bad state” of England during Richard’s rule; in the same letter, Edward hopes the Earl of Buckingham’s rebellion will be “withstanded”. The ambiguous wording of the correspondence suggests a climate of fear and political instability, underscoring the insecure nature of Richard’s rule. By analyzing these sources, this paper highlights how Richard’s political maneuvering not only hastened his downfall but led to a complex and contested historical legacy. This analysis ultimately reveals the cooperation between historical fact and political narrative in creating Richard III’s reputation.
Start Time
16-4-2025 11:00 AM
End Time
16-4-2025 12:00 PM
Room Number
304
Presentation Type
Oral Presentation
Presentation Subtype
Grad/Non-comp Orals
Presentation Category
Art and Humanities
Faculty Mentor
Brian Maxson
The Downfall of Richard III In Context
304
Richard III’s downfall and lasting reputation as a ruthless usurper was a direct consequence of his lust for power and self-interest. This study examines how the contemporary accounts from Richard’s reign contrast from later historical revisionism. Primary sources from Richard’s time were shaped by shifting alliances and craft a bleak picture of Richard’s reign. A compelling piece of evidence lies within an October 1483 correspondence from the Plumpton Letters written to Robert Plumpton by his brother Edward. This letter appears to hold self-censorship, with Edward lamenting the “bad state” of England during Richard’s rule; in the same letter, Edward hopes the Earl of Buckingham’s rebellion will be “withstanded”. The ambiguous wording of the correspondence suggests a climate of fear and political instability, underscoring the insecure nature of Richard’s rule. By analyzing these sources, this paper highlights how Richard’s political maneuvering not only hastened his downfall but led to a complex and contested historical legacy. This analysis ultimately reveals the cooperation between historical fact and political narrative in creating Richard III’s reputation.